Now that's ironic

Take a look at the certificate of service on page 9 of the Government's opposition to the petition for reconsideration in United States v. Rodriguez, No. 07-0900/MC. It doesn't comply with CAAF Rule 39(g).

Rule 39(g) requires that the certificate of filing and service indicate "the specific manner of filing under Rule 36 and the specific manner of service under this rule." Ironically enough, the certificate of filing and service on the Government's opp doesn't indicate the specific manner of service on appellant's counsel.