data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dd156/dd15633a5dd69bfb0527a9e430da7aeb24e88e5e" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1ee47/1ee47d3cb4ecda24be505ec5cb9a3814919beb58" alt="".jpg)
Thursday, January 15, 2009
CAAF orders additional briefing in Smead
On Monday, CAAF heard oral argument in United States v. Smead, No. 08-0376/MC. Yesterday, CAAF ordered additional briefing in the case. CAAF gave appellate defense counsel 15 days to file a supplemental brief addressing "WHETHER THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRED IN HOLDING THAT THE CHARGE OF RAPE OF A CHILD, WITHDRAWN AND DISMISSED 'WITH PREJUDICE' AT APPELLANT'S FIRST COURT-MARTIAL, COULD BE REFILED PRIOR TO APPELLANT’S REHEARING." The Government then has 15 days to file its brief and the defense has another 5 days to file a reply.
Labels:
CAAF docket
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Dwight - was there any element of double jeopardy at the time that the charge was dismissed with prejudice?
Post a Comment