Wednesday, January 07, 2009

CAAF issues Conliffe opinion

Here's a link. More later.

6 comments:

Dew_Process said...

The Dissents are the interesting parts of the Decision - "Medina, wherefore art thou??????"

Anonymous said...

Absolute no brainer that ART 133 is a "purely miltary offense." But I agree -- what happened to Medina?

Anonymous said...

Agree about the 133 being purely military. I think this demonstrates that Medina was never as broad as many thought, to include Judges Erdmann and Ryan.

dreadnaught said...

Best line: “So far so good.” - Judge Ryan.

Anonymous said...

CAAF throws another bone to a sex offender.

Anonymous said...

Defense needs to ask for reconsideration on this one, and lay out the Medina problem. This case is NOT consistent with Medina.