CAAFlog: CAAF issues Conliffe opinion

Wednesday, January 07, 2009

CAAF issues Conliffe opinion

Here's a link. More later.

6 comments:

Dew_Process said...: The Dissents are the interesting parts of the Decision - "Medina, wherefore art thou??????"; Wed Jan 07, 05:28:00 PM EST
Anonymous said...: Absolute no brainer that ART 133 is a "purely miltary offense." But I agree -- what happened to Medina?; Wed Jan 07, 06:05:00 PM EST
Anonymous said...: Agree about the 133 being purely military. I think this demonstrates that Medina was never as broad as many thought, to include Judges Erdmann and Ryan.; Wed Jan 07, 06:52:00 PM EST
Anonymous said...: Best line: “So far so good.” - Judge Ryan.; Wed Jan 07, 09:51:00 PM EST
Anonymous said...: CAAF throws another bone to a sex offender.; Thu Jan 08, 07:22:00 AM EST
Anonymous said...: Defense needs to ask for reconsideration on this one, and lay out the Medina problem. This case is NOT consistent with Medina.; Thu Jan 08, 07:51:00 AM EST

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)