Military justice blogs are to blogs as military music is to music. The views expressed on this blog are offered in the contributors' personal capacity. They do not purport to be speaking for, and their views should not be imputed to, any other organization, agency, or entity.
.jpg)
Military justice research links
- 2008 Military Judges' Benchbook web site
- AFMAN 51-203, Records of Trial (1 Oct 1999)
- AFPD 51-2, Administration of Military Justice (7 Sep 1993)
- Air Force Instruction 51-201, Administration of Military Justice (21 Dec 07)
- Air Force Rules of Professional Conduct
- AR 27-10, Military Justice (16 Nov 2005)
- AR 27-26, Rules of Professional Conduct for Lawyers (1 May 1992)
- COMDTINST M5810.1D, Military Justice Manual (17 Aug 2000)
- Congressional Research Service, Statutory Interpretation: General Principles and Trends (March 30, 2006 ed.)
- Congressional Research Service, The Constitution of the United States of America, Analysis and Interpretation: Analysis of Cases Decided by the Supreme Court of the United States (2002) with 2006 supplement
- JAGINST 5803.1C, Professional Conduct of Attorneys Practicing Under the Cognizance and Supervision of the Judge Advocate General (9 Nov 04)
- JAGINST 5810.2A, Military Justice Regulations (17 Sep 93)
- JAGMAN, JAGINST 5800.7E (20 Jun 07)
- Law Library Microform Consortium, Military Law Collection
- LOC military law collection
- Manual for Courts-Martial (2008 ed.)
- Manual for Courts-Martial, United States (2005 ed.)
- Manual of the Judge Advocate General (JAGMAN), JAGINST 5800.7E (20 Jun 2007)
- Military Justice, Army Regulation 27-10 (16 Nov 2005)
- UCMJ (as of 28 Jan 2008)
Links
- ACCA's web site
- AFCCA's web site
- AIr Force Judge Advocate General's School's web site
- Air Force Law Review
- Army Lawyer
- Army Trial Judiciary's docket
- CAAF's web site
- CAAFlog.com
- CGCCA's web site
- Coast Guard trial and appellate dockets
- Court-Martial Trial Practice blog
- JAA American Inn of Court's web site
- JAA's web site
- JAG LAW Blog
- JAG Magazine [Navy]
- Journal of Military and Veteran Law
- Military Law Review
- Naval Law Review
- NIMJ's web site
- NJS's web site
- NMCCA's web site
- SCOTUSblog (aka, the greatest blog on the planet)
- Supreme Court's web site
- The Reporter [Air Force]
- This Court-Martial Sentences You To . . . [blog]
- TJAGLCS's web site
Blog archive
-
▼
2007
(657)
-
▼
February
(46)
- New published CGCCA UA/providence inquiry opinion
- Tracking trial-level courts-martial
- Othuru effect
- Tate's fate includes NC&PB date (after long wait)
- Military death penalty system by the numbers
- New NMCCA Chief Judge
- New published AFCCA case
- CAAF invites amicus briefs
- De facto automatic jurisdiction?
- Fascinating statistic
- The Diaz case just won't end
- The era of three-part harmony ends
- Lovett Denied
- What's New is old again
- Restitution and confinement contingent on restitut...
- Migration of military case law
- The Moreno Doppelganger
- Moreno effect? (part trois)
- Plane error
- Another bite at the apple?
- Request for additional time to file cert petition ...
- Have an ice Valentine's Day
- They're Back . . .
- Bye, bye, bovine
- Ghosts in the machine
- The Rhodes less traveled
- Happy New Year, NMCCA
- Stop reading this blog
- Fear and loathing at NMCCA
- Chinese Calendar May Say Year of the Dinghai (Fire...
- Appellate post delay
- Interesting Developments at C.A.A.F.
- CAAF rejects amicus brief: Why can't we be friends?
- Gathering Dust
- SG in the passing Lane
- The post-trial delay fairy
- New published CGCCA Pierce credit case
- Naval Academy Quarterback Case Featured on WJZ 13
- Annual Manual?
- Haditha Case is . . . A Mess?
- Too good to be true?
- Supreme Court update
- CAAF Recap
- New published ACCA decision
- Subject Matter Days at CAAF
- Two new CAAF opinions
-
▼
February
(46)
Labels
- Admin (14)
- Architecture (2)
- Art. 2a10 (27)
- Article 125 (1)
- CAAF docket (41)
- CAAF grants (28)
- CAAF judges (2)
- CAAF oral argument audio (11)
- Capital courts-martial (46)
- CCAs (32)
- CLE/Events (13)
- collateral review (4)
- Court-martial news (69)
- habeas (5)
- MEJA (31)
- Military commissions (5)
- Military justice legislation (19)
- Military justice reform (18)
- MilJus Scholarship (22)
- New Article 120 (8)
- New CAAF opinions (40)
- New CCA opinions (47)
- Rants (9)
- SCOTUS MilJus Cases (64)
- TWIMJ (39)
- US SOFAs (16)
Contributors
Our contact information
You can reach us by email at:
caaflog@caaflog.com
caaflog@caaflog.com
Posts
7 comments:
In light of how CAAFlog has cited the Air Force's Appellate Defense Division for uninformative issue framing from time to time, I'll note that our issue presented in Warden was "WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ERRED BY INSTRUCTING THE MEMBERS THAT THEY COULD ADJUDGE A BAD CONDUCT DISCHARGE WHEN APPELLANT DID NOT ADMIT IN HER PROVIDENCY INQUIRY TO WRONGFULLY APPROPRIATING MORE THAN $500.00 ON ANY ONE OCCASION, THE MEMBERS NEVER FOUND THAT APPELLANT HAD WRONGFULLY APPROPRIATED MORE THAN $500.00 ON ANY ONE OCCASION, AND TRIAL COUNSEL HAD AGREED WITH THE MILITARY JUDGE THAT THE MAXIMUM AUTHORIZED SENTENCE BASED SOLELY ON APPELLANT’S PROVIDENCY INQUIRY DID NOT INCLUDE A BAD CONDUCT DISCHARGE." I characterized the military judge's ruling as a violation of Apprendi, Ring and Blakely, but the Court of Criminal Appeals declined to base its opinion on that line of precedent.
Fitz,
BZ on the issue framing! (If you've read enough CAAFlog to have seen me dissing certain issues' framing, you've also read enough to know what "BZ" means.) But this whole hidden identity nom de plume thing doesn't work if you fess up to being counsel in a case that anyone can see just by clicking on a link. :-)
While I like the issue, it has been my experience that the C.A.A.F. changes deep issue statements if they are too lengthy. I second CAAFlog's thoughts on the name. While the average CCA judge will still not be able to out you, which may have been your intent, the rest of the world, including now famous Floridian probate judges, may be able to put it together.
Thanks! I figured that if I were going to "out" myself, this would be as good a time as any. :-)
Will CAAFlog be making an appearance at 450 E. St. NW this week? The Court is hosting back-to-back USAF doubleheaders: Carr & Erickson on Tuesday and Bare & Tippit on Wednesday.
Sacre bleu! Tomorrow should be a fun day at CAAF -- the U-Haul case AND the Hitler/Osama Bin Laden/devil/going to hell argument case. To quote Ernie Banks, "Let's play two!"
And how is it possible that the words "Apprendi," "Ring," and "Blakely" appeared in a comment more than nine hours ago and the No Man hasn't weighed in yet?
I just listened to the CAAF argument in Schroder on 6 Feb 07. Did anybody catch the Apprendi/Blakely question by Chief Judge Effron to Mary Hall?
Post a Comment