data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/06158/061581716e3f276a23f1c33270a27fad63f9f9e6" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dd156/dd15633a5dd69bfb0527a9e430da7aeb24e88e5e" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1ee47/1ee47d3cb4ecda24be505ec5cb9a3814919beb58" alt="".jpg)
Tuesday, February 06, 2007
Gathering Dust
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/06158/061581716e3f276a23f1c33270a27fad63f9f9e6" alt=""
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Military justice blogs are to blogs as military music is to music. The views expressed on this blog are offered in the contributors' personal capacity. They do not purport to be speaking for, and their views should not be imputed to, any other organization, agency, or entity.
2 comments:
You and your cow may be waiting a long time. The cases that the Court passed on this past term suggest that, unless the C.A.A.F. asserts jurisdiction over civil litigation pursuant to the Soldier's and Sailor's Civil Relief Act, the Supreme Court will not interfere.
Actually, Guert, that's what I expect next. The CAAF's historical tendency toward self-aggrandizement frequently has caused it to have an overexpanisve (in my view) sense of its own jurisdictional powers.
Post a Comment