.jpg)
Wednesday, March 05, 2008
Operation Joint Appendicitis time change
The briefing on the Joint Appendix rule, which we previously discussed here, has been rescheduled for 1300 on Friday, 14 March.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Military justice blogs are to blogs as military music is to music. The views expressed on this blog are offered in the contributors' personal capacity. They do not purport to be speaking for, and their views should not be imputed to, any other organization, agency, or entity.
Military justice research links
- 2008 Military Judges' Benchbook web site
- AFMAN 51-203, Records of Trial (1 Oct 1999)
- AFPD 51-2, Administration of Military Justice (7 Sep 1993)
- Air Force Instruction 51-201, Administration of Military Justice (21 Dec 07)
- Air Force Rules of Professional Conduct
- AR 27-10, Military Justice (16 Nov 2005)
- AR 27-26, Rules of Professional Conduct for Lawyers (1 May 1992)
- COMDTINST M5810.1D, Military Justice Manual (17 Aug 2000)
- Congressional Research Service, Statutory Interpretation: General Principles and Trends (March 30, 2006 ed.)
- Congressional Research Service, The Constitution of the United States of America, Analysis and Interpretation: Analysis of Cases Decided by the Supreme Court of the United States (2002) with 2006 supplement
- JAGINST 5803.1C, Professional Conduct of Attorneys Practicing Under the Cognizance and Supervision of the Judge Advocate General (9 Nov 04)
- JAGINST 5810.2A, Military Justice Regulations (17 Sep 93)
- JAGMAN, JAGINST 5800.7E (20 Jun 07)
- Law Library Microform Consortium, Military Law Collection
- LOC military law collection
- Manual for Courts-Martial (2008 ed.)
- Manual for Courts-Martial, United States (2005 ed.)
- Manual of the Judge Advocate General (JAGMAN), JAGINST 5800.7E (20 Jun 2007)
- Military Justice, Army Regulation 27-10 (16 Nov 2005)
- UCMJ (as of 28 Jan 2008)
Links
- ACCA's web site
- AFCCA's web site
- AIr Force Judge Advocate General's School's web site
- Air Force Law Review
- Army Lawyer
- Army Trial Judiciary's docket
- CAAF's web site
- CAAFlog.com
- CGCCA's web site
- Coast Guard trial and appellate dockets
- Court-Martial Trial Practice blog
- JAA American Inn of Court's web site
- JAA's web site
- JAG LAW Blog
- JAG Magazine [Navy]
- Journal of Military and Veteran Law
- Military Law Review
- Naval Law Review
- NIMJ's web site
- NJS's web site
- NMCCA's web site
- SCOTUSblog (aka, the greatest blog on the planet)
- Supreme Court's web site
- The Reporter [Air Force]
- This Court-Martial Sentences You To . . . [blog]
- TJAGLCS's web site
Blog archive
-
▼
2008
(813)
-
▼
March
(63)
- Competing competing consent opinions
- NMCCA published en banc opinion reverses decision ...
- Another Art. 2(a)(10), UCMJ Article
- Midterm
- Government dismisses charges in United States v. T...
- New Army Lawyer issue posted online
- Air Force Court creates service split on whether v...
- AFCCA published competing consent/inevitable disco...
- CAAF grants on housebreaking issue
- Pack distributed for 11 April conference
- A Celebration of Sorts . . . CAAFlog passes 1,000 ...
- SG waives response in Pack
- New issue of Military Law Review online
- Daily journal update for In re Ali
- Brief new CAAF opinion on illegal pretrial confine...
- To quote Grease, "Tell me more, tell me more"
- CAAF denies writ appeal in capital court-martial case
- CAAF questions NMCCA's failure to reduce sentence ...
- CGCCA sets aside guilty plea based on military jud...
- Interesting CGCCA writ
- Navy-Marine Corps Appellate Government seeks recon...
- Much to discuss
- Trial defense counsel -- don't throw out your 2005...
- 2008 MCM available from GPO bookstore
- NIMJ is hiring two full-time employees
- Interesting denial of extraordinary relief
- New issue of The Reporter published
- Cossio apparently unpublished
- New military cert petition
- Air Force Law Review Is Available On-line
- CAAF affirms AFCCA in Perez
- Supremes to take their shot at Harcrow issue
- New Air Force Law Review issue
- New published NMCCA decision
- Two related pretrial confinement credit grants
- One of the most intriguing daily journal entries e...
- Hard cases may make bad law, but the Harcrow case ...
- CAAF addresses another Crawford issue in Harcrow
- United States v. Allende: substitute authenticati...
- United States v. Nieto: punting on the propriety ...
- Two new CAAF opinions
- SecDef Art. 2(a)(10) Withholding memo
- CAAF supports motherhood revisited
- Denedo v. United States is up on CAAF's web site
- Lopez de Victoria SitRep?
- News flash: Joint Services Committee says that 20...
- Washington Times op-ed
- To quote Jack Norworth and Albert Von Tilzer, take...
- Revisiting Cabrera-Frattini
- New published NMCCA opinion
- Possible published opinon
- Old business: United States v. Grisham
- End of oral argument season reception
- Operation Joint Appendicitis time change
- Czachorowski amicus
- The nature of blogging
- A cure for Joint Appendicitis
- Opinions galore
- A quick look at Cabrera-Frattini
- JO'C on military appellate review cont'
- Yikes!
- AVA a-okay
- Schedule reminders
-
▼
March
(63)
Labels
- Admin (14)
- Architecture (2)
- Art. 2a10 (27)
- Article 125 (1)
- CAAF docket (41)
- CAAF grants (28)
- CAAF judges (2)
- CAAF oral argument audio (11)
- Capital courts-martial (46)
- CCAs (32)
- CLE/Events (13)
- collateral review (4)
- Court-martial news (69)
- habeas (5)
- MEJA (31)
- Military commissions (5)
- Military justice legislation (19)
- Military justice reform (18)
- MilJus Scholarship (22)
- New Article 120 (8)
- New CAAF opinions (40)
- New CCA opinions (47)
- Rants (9)
- SCOTUS MilJus Cases (64)
- TWIMJ (39)
- US SOFAs (16)
Contributors
Our contact information
You can reach us by email at:
caaflog@caaflog.com
caaflog@caaflog.com
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment