Today's daily journal update included the following issue certified by the Judge Advocate General of the Air Force:
WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ABUSED HIS DISCRETION IN GRANTING THE DEFENSE MOTION TO SUPPRESS ALL EVIDENCE RESULTING FROM APPELLEE’S URINALYSIS TEST.
United States v. Miller, __ M.J. ___, No. 07-5004/AF (C.A.A.F. Sept. 7, 2007).
The Air Force Court's opinion, which rejected a government appeal under Article 62, is available here. United States v. Miller, No. Misc. Dkt. 2007-02 (A.F. Ct. Crim. App. June 25, 2007).
Tuesday, September 11, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Wish the JAG would have utilized Garner’s “deep issue” style on this issue. On the other hand, it does leave me wondering what this is about. Maybe he’s just trying to lure me in with this cliffhanger…
Post a Comment