United States v. Young, __ M.J. ___, No. 06-0505/AR (C.A.A.F. March 21, 2007).
Judge Erdmann for a unanimous court.
Guert, wanna race?
Military justice blogs are to blogs as military music is to music. The views expressed on this blog are offered in the contributors' personal capacity. They do not purport to be speaking for, and their views should not be imputed to, any other organization, agency, or entity.
4 comments:
I win. You can have the decisions for the rest of the month. I have some things to tend to here at ARC.
The first three rules of CAAFlog:
1) There is no CAAFlog;
2) Don't challenge the dead to demonstrations of speed;
3) Don't provoke O'Connor over his taxes or hackery.
No fair! Apparently in addition to figuring out that whole resurrection thing, Guert has mastered time travel.
Guert:
I resent the hackery comment, particularly from a dead guy. I am something different from a hack, though I'm not sure what the right word is. It reminds me of the doctor's line (I think it was Robert Preston) in S.O.B., upon being called a sheister: "I'll have you know, a sheister is a disreputable lawyer. I am a quack."
Post a Comment