data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dd156/dd15633a5dd69bfb0527a9e430da7aeb24e88e5e" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1ee47/1ee47d3cb4ecda24be505ec5cb9a3814919beb58" alt="".jpg)
Friday, December 15, 2006
Craig QP
Whether a harmless beyond a reasonable doubt analysis applies to a violation of an appellant's right to a speedy post-trial appeal, which is recognized as a constitutional due process right and is tested under an analysis that already includes the element of prejudice derived from Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 (1972).
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment