Friday, December 15, 2006
Craig QP
Whether a harmless beyond a reasonable doubt analysis applies to a violation of an appellant's right to a speedy post-trial appeal, which is recognized as a constitutional due process right and is tested under an analysis that already includes the element of prejudice derived from Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 (1972).
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment