Friday, May 01, 2009

Chessani Denied, Not Much More

Here is a link to the unexciting order denying En Banc reconsideration in Chessani.

For those reading Mary Hall's post below and agreeing with her, you should start a campaign of Judge Ryan for SCOTUS.

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

what's up with the mass deletion of comments? Change in policy?

Anonymous said...

Let's debate something fun, like whether carreer defense attorneys will be able to promote in the watered down military justice track.

Anonymous said...

Sure, which career defense counsels have not been promoted?

Jason Grover said...

By my quick count there are 5 O-4s waiting for O-5 results that have been selected for the Navy's Military Justice Litigation Career track (me included). Not positive, but I think 3 have been both trial counsel and defense counsel. One I am not sure about one off the top of my head and one has only been a defense counsel. I cannot speak for all of CAAFlog, but I will be watching this closely! With an 80% select rate in the precept, I have high hopes we will all be selected. One could hope that none of us are in the bottom 20% of in-zone O-4s, but you never know. It is not as if boards never make mistakes, both in those selected and those not selected. Heck, they selected me to O-4 in the first place which may have been questionable, at least according to No Man.