.jpg)
A lot happened in military justice today. The No Man has already posted about one of the day's big events -- the release of NMCCA's opinion in Carlson. (The opinion was dated yesterday but wasn't available on NMCCA's web site until today.) I'll have several additional posts later tonight.
A number of you have noted problems with comments disappearing. This seems to be the work of a "bug" in blogger's system. (Blogger is CAAFlog's host.) The No Man found this explanation, which suggests that the problem is now fixed.
Military justice blogs are to blogs as military music is to music. The views expressed on this blog are offered in the contributors' personal capacity. They do not purport to be speaking for, and their views should not be imputed to, any other organization, agency, or entity.
Military justice research links
- 2008 Military Judges' Benchbook web site
- AFMAN 51-203, Records of Trial (1 Oct 1999)
- AFPD 51-2, Administration of Military Justice (7 Sep 1993)
- Air Force Instruction 51-201, Administration of Military Justice (21 Dec 07)
- Air Force Rules of Professional Conduct
- AR 27-10, Military Justice (16 Nov 2005)
- AR 27-26, Rules of Professional Conduct for Lawyers (1 May 1992)
- COMDTINST M5810.1D, Military Justice Manual (17 Aug 2000)
- Congressional Research Service, Statutory Interpretation: General Principles and Trends (March 30, 2006 ed.)
- Congressional Research Service, The Constitution of the United States of America, Analysis and Interpretation: Analysis of Cases Decided by the Supreme Court of the United States (2002) with 2006 supplement
- JAGINST 5803.1C, Professional Conduct of Attorneys Practicing Under the Cognizance and Supervision of the Judge Advocate General (9 Nov 04)
- JAGINST 5810.2A, Military Justice Regulations (17 Sep 93)
- JAGMAN, JAGINST 5800.7E (20 Jun 07)
- Law Library Microform Consortium, Military Law Collection
- LOC military law collection
- Manual for Courts-Martial (2008 ed.)
- Manual for Courts-Martial, United States (2005 ed.)
- Manual of the Judge Advocate General (JAGMAN), JAGINST 5800.7E (20 Jun 2007)
- Military Justice, Army Regulation 27-10 (16 Nov 2005)
- UCMJ (as of 28 Jan 2008)
Links
- ACCA's web site
- AFCCA's web site
- AIr Force Judge Advocate General's School's web site
- Air Force Law Review
- Army Lawyer
- Army Trial Judiciary's docket
- CAAF's web site
- CAAFlog.com
- CGCCA's web site
- Coast Guard trial and appellate dockets
- Court-Martial Trial Practice blog
- JAA American Inn of Court's web site
- JAA's web site
- JAG LAW Blog
- JAG Magazine [Navy]
- Journal of Military and Veteran Law
- Military Law Review
- Naval Law Review
- NIMJ's web site
- NJS's web site
- NMCCA's web site
- SCOTUSblog (aka, the greatest blog on the planet)
- Supreme Court's web site
- The Reporter [Air Force]
- This Court-Martial Sentences You To . . . [blog]
- TJAGLCS's web site
Blog archive
-
▼
2009
(520)
-
▼
May
(86)
- This week in military justice -- 31 May 2009 edition
- DOD witness identified for Supreme Court cert juri...
- Degraded comments?
- BIG news: Rodriguez files cert petition
- SCOTUS extends SG's response period in Wuterich
- House Judiciary Committee confirms 5 June hearing ...
- Fascinating published AFCCA opinion
- NMCCA sets aside child porn distribution convictio...
- DOD web site indicates House Judiciary subcommitte...
- ACCA holds an accused's statements dissing the Arm...
- No Chessani Certification
- Fairley and Crotchett Writs
- Art. 32 Today in Air Force Euthanasia Case
- CAAF grant
- Sotomayor to SCOTUS?
- CAAF assesses petitions' timeliness
- Chessani watch
- Foster follow-up
- This week in military justice -- 24 May 2009 edition
- Recent activity in the Gray habeas case
- A final thought about the Green case [REVISED]
- More on Green sentencing
- A quick thought about CAAF's proposed rules changes
- NIMJ proposes sea change in CAAF's practice
- Green receives life sentence
- MUST READING for military appellate defense counse...
- Green sentencing deliberations to continue Thursday
- CAAF grant
- New published AFCCA case narrowly construes R.C.M....
- Second Cox Commission Public Hearing and Topics An...
- New Published NMCCA Case, Garner
- New issue of JAG Magazine
- Navy JAG certifies Article 120 constitutionality c...
- Green capital MEJA sentencing case concludes
- CAAF Opinion: Collier on Defense Right to Present...
- No Denedo, 2 MilJus Denieds at SCOTUS
- Court-Martial News Roundup
- Corrected notice of proposed CAAF rules changes
- Next week in military justice -- 15 May 2009 edition
- Coast Guard trial judge moots Article 120 challeng...
- A short look at Yammine
- Green sentencing case continues
- Professor Gary Solis testifies at Green capital ME...
- Another en banc published NMCCA opinion
- Green capital MEJA prosecution update
- Bio of Colonel Wintrhrop published
- Sergeant Charged in Camp Liberty Shootings
- CAAF rejects Care inquiry challenge
- CAAF releases Sanders opinion
- BREAKING NEWS: NMCCA grants government's Crotchet...
- Gray's counsel move for extension to filing deadline
- Prosecution rests sentencing case in Green capital...
- This week in military justice -- 10 May 2009 edition
- A look ahead at the Green MEJA capital prosecution...
- Humble Response to the McCain-Graham WSJ Op-Ed on ...
- U.S. district court grants Gray's motion for appoi...
- CAAF finds waiver in Campos
- April Army Lawyer online
- ACCA's Anderson decisions
- Ayala MEJA Case Sentencing
- Is 1st Lt Watada Free and Clear?
- Green capital sentencing phase to start on Monday
- CAAF grant
- Green convicted in Iraq rape, murders
- Published ACCA decision
- No second court-martial for 1LT Watada
- CAAF releases its opinion in Delarosa
- Jury begins deliberations in United States v. Green
- Defense rests in Green capital MEJA prosecution
- The Green capital MEJA trial: the prosecution rests
- CAAF annual reception
- Ediger grant, cont'
- Amusing SCOTUS typo
- No Denedo Siting
- This week in military justice -- 3 May 2009 edition
- Green update
- Charlie Gittins vows to use DOJ memos to challenge...
- Two CAAF grants
- Further clarification regarding attempts to have N...
- Proposed CAAF rules changes
- Gray petitions for appointment of CHU counsel
- United States opposes Gray's habeas petition
- Big news day
- Carlson Part Deux, NMCCA Rules on USACIL Problems
- Chessani Denied, Not Much More
- Exit Justice Souter
-
▼
May
(86)
Labels
- Admin (14)
- Architecture (2)
- Art. 2a10 (27)
- Article 125 (1)
- CAAF docket (41)
- CAAF grants (28)
- CAAF judges (2)
- CAAF oral argument audio (11)
- Capital courts-martial (46)
- CCAs (32)
- CLE/Events (13)
- collateral review (4)
- Court-martial news (69)
- habeas (5)
- MEJA (31)
- Military commissions (5)
- Military justice legislation (19)
- Military justice reform (18)
- MilJus Scholarship (22)
- New Article 120 (8)
- New CAAF opinions (40)
- New CCA opinions (47)
- Rants (9)
- SCOTUS MilJus Cases (64)
- TWIMJ (39)
- US SOFAs (16)
Contributors
Our contact information
You can reach us by email at:
caaflog@caaflog.com
caaflog@caaflog.com
Posts
4 comments:
....I thought it was just the new policy to delete all posts from Tony Cossio.....but it just turns out to be a regular government conspiracy....
CAAFlog,
Your whitewashing of the comment disappearances could not be more transparent. Blaming Blogger is clearly a pretext for a more sinister cabal. With all due respect, (H/T Ricky Bobby) your excuses are not worth a velvet painting of a whale and dolphin getting it on.
It could not be more incontrovertible that you are covering for a motley confederacy of disgraced French and Spanish captains and Barbary pirates bent on retribution against Sir Cloudesley Shovell. End the façade and allow Cloudesley’s comments see the light of day.
Viva la Shovell!
I agree. CAAFlog and the other evil assasins on its blogger management team seem to delete any comments they don't like or may be perceived as controversial. Oh yeah, I forgot, the first amendment apparently doesn't apply to the military. Perhaps CAAFlog should adopt an NBC-like logo to remind us of its required one-sided presentation. I can understand deleting obscenities, etc. But deleting differing viewpoints - not kosher.
I am out in the civvie world now. A few years ago one of my retail clients got a set of "discovery" and affidavit form in the mail. Turned out they were from a true believer in sovereign citizen.
Him and his buddies had formed their own common law court and were suing people. Reason he was mad because they turned him down for credit, and by using the credit system to check on him they became part of the international cabal made up of the Kings of Germany, England, and France, and the international jewish bankers, to set up a straw man corporation for each person in the US, and steal that personhood. The BS got deeper, but what happened is we ignored it, the fake court issued a judgment against them, and the idiot tried to collect by buying a big ticket item with a phoney government warrant check. I had told them to watch out for that, so it went no-where.
Now that is a real conspiracy theory.
Post a Comment