Friday, May 01, 2009

Chessani Denied, Not Much More

Here is a link to the unexciting order denying En Banc reconsideration in Chessani.

For those reading Mary Hall's post below and agreeing with her, you should start a campaign of Judge Ryan for SCOTUS.
Posted by Mike "No Man" Navarre at 9:44 AM
Labels:

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

what's up with the mass deletion of comments? Change in policy?

Fri May 01, 11:40:00 AM EDT
Anonymous said...

Let's debate something fun, like whether carreer defense attorneys will be able to promote in the watered down military justice track.

Fri May 01, 01:31:00 PM EDT
Anonymous said...

Sure, which career defense counsels have not been promoted?

Fri May 01, 01:49:00 PM EDT
Jason Grover said...

By my quick count there are 5 O-4s waiting for O-5 results that have been selected for the Navy's Military Justice Litigation Career track (me included). Not positive, but I think 3 have been both trial counsel and defense counsel. One I am not sure about one off the top of my head and one has only been a defense counsel. I cannot speak for all of CAAFlog, but I will be watching this closely! With an 80% select rate in the precept, I have high hopes we will all be selected. One could hope that none of us are in the bottom 20% of in-zone O-4s, but you never know. It is not as if boards never make mistakes, both in those selected and those not selected. Heck, they selected me to O-4 in the first place which may have been questionable, at least according to No Man.

Sat May 02, 12:23:00 PM EDT

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)