.jpg)
In United States v. Bartlett, __ M.J. ___, No. 07-0636/AR (C.A.A.F. July 7, 2008), CAAF invalidated a portion of Army Reg. 27-10 that apparently prohibited members of the Medical Corps, Medical Specialist Corps, Army Nurse Corps, Dental Corps, Chaplain Corps, and Veterinary Corps, as well as those detailed to Inspector General duty, from serving as court-martial members.
But CAAF held that the erroneous limitation on the discretion of the convening authority in selecting members of LTC Bartlett's panel was harmless.
More tonight.
Military justice blogs are to blogs as military music is to music. The views expressed on this blog are offered in the contributors' personal capacity. They do not purport to be speaking for, and their views should not be imputed to, any other organization, agency, or entity.
Military justice research links
- 2008 Military Judges' Benchbook web site
- AFMAN 51-203, Records of Trial (1 Oct 1999)
- AFPD 51-2, Administration of Military Justice (7 Sep 1993)
- Air Force Instruction 51-201, Administration of Military Justice (21 Dec 07)
- Air Force Rules of Professional Conduct
- AR 27-10, Military Justice (16 Nov 2005)
- AR 27-26, Rules of Professional Conduct for Lawyers (1 May 1992)
- COMDTINST M5810.1D, Military Justice Manual (17 Aug 2000)
- Congressional Research Service, Statutory Interpretation: General Principles and Trends (March 30, 2006 ed.)
- Congressional Research Service, The Constitution of the United States of America, Analysis and Interpretation: Analysis of Cases Decided by the Supreme Court of the United States (2002) with 2006 supplement
- JAGINST 5803.1C, Professional Conduct of Attorneys Practicing Under the Cognizance and Supervision of the Judge Advocate General (9 Nov 04)
- JAGINST 5810.2A, Military Justice Regulations (17 Sep 93)
- JAGMAN, JAGINST 5800.7E (20 Jun 07)
- Law Library Microform Consortium, Military Law Collection
- LOC military law collection
- Manual for Courts-Martial (2008 ed.)
- Manual for Courts-Martial, United States (2005 ed.)
- Manual of the Judge Advocate General (JAGMAN), JAGINST 5800.7E (20 Jun 2007)
- Military Justice, Army Regulation 27-10 (16 Nov 2005)
- UCMJ (as of 28 Jan 2008)
Links
- ACCA's web site
- AFCCA's web site
- AIr Force Judge Advocate General's School's web site
- Air Force Law Review
- Army Lawyer
- Army Trial Judiciary's docket
- CAAF's web site
- CAAFlog.com
- CGCCA's web site
- Coast Guard trial and appellate dockets
- Court-Martial Trial Practice blog
- JAA American Inn of Court's web site
- JAA's web site
- JAG LAW Blog
- JAG Magazine [Navy]
- Journal of Military and Veteran Law
- Military Law Review
- Naval Law Review
- NIMJ's web site
- NJS's web site
- NMCCA's web site
- SCOTUSblog (aka, the greatest blog on the planet)
- Supreme Court's web site
- The Reporter [Air Force]
- This Court-Martial Sentences You To . . . [blog]
- TJAGLCS's web site
Blog archive
-
▼
2008
(813)
-
▼
July
(71)
- Gray's federal habeas representation
- S.2052 Equal Justice . . . Act: Held Over
- CAAF and representation at the Supremes
- Cert petition challenges military appellate defens...
- Thomas cert petition QP
- Number of military executions in the UCMJ era
- Full text of 2008 MCM amendments
- New military cert petition
- Acting SG joins Louisiana in seeking rehearing of ...
- Senate Judiciary Committee to consider expansion o...
- New military cert petition filed
- SIGNIFICANT MILITARY JUSTICE DEVELOPMENT: Presiden...
- Resource: Article on Military Contractor Status in...
- Military justice: still the Rodney Dangerfield of ...
- CAAF signals interest in member challenge case
- New pro se IFP military cert petition
- New commentator in the CAAFlog herd
- Updates
- POTUS signs 2008 MCM amendments
- The Senate approves two new three-star constellations
- BREAKING NEWS: CAAF orders oral argument in Wuterich
- Denedo cont'
- Acting SG seeks still more time in Denedo
- Interrogation evidence ruling in Hamdan
- Military law front and center in Kennedy v. Louisi...
- My apologies to the good -- and apparently sober -...
- Important voluntary intoxication decision
- And a new published ACCA opinion
- New published AFCCA opinion
- Some numbers
- CBS Petition in SSgt Wuterich case
- Canadian Deserter Legal Update
- CAAF grants review of yet another child pornograph...
- New military cert petition in a case with no SCOTU...
- The Military Justice Symposium issue is here!
- Wuterich Writ Day
- The 2008 Silver CAAF Tongue Award Winner
- That's a wrap
- The 10th Circuit on Article 134 convictions
- NMCCA on interpanel accord (kind of)
- Legal posture of U.S. military deserters in Canada
- Shocking News: CAAFlog Blogger Court-Martialed
- Next term
- And then there was one: a CAAFlog contest
- To quote Roger McGuinn, goin' down to the country
- CAAF releases opinion in Czachorowski
- Putting the brakes on Wheeler
- CAAF grants review of Article 32 waiver issue
- CAAF orders further proceedings on Grostefon issue
- Ask and ye shall receive?
- Walker's central holding
- Wagner on 802 conferences
- NMCCA sets aside death sentence in Walker
- CAAF invalidates Army Reg's prohibition against ce...
- To paraphrase Tina Turner, big Wheeler keep on tur...
- Don't bother trying to reach the No Man Monday mor...
- Recent note on Article 120
- May Army Lawyer online
- An Article 62 timeline
- When you wish upon a third star
- Whither Wheeler?
- QP from Moorefield cert petition
- Air Force JAG nominated for third star
- Independence Day Thoughts
- Another military cert petition
- DOJ notes possibility that Kennedy v. Louisiana do...
- BREAKING NEWS: ACCA issues published opinion in A...
- CAAF grants review to test CCAs' corrective powers
- SSgt Wuterich petitions CAAF
- Navy JAG nominated for third star
- Dossey dosey-dos to CAAF
-
▼
July
(71)
Labels
- Admin (14)
- Architecture (2)
- Art. 2a10 (27)
- Article 125 (1)
- CAAF docket (41)
- CAAF grants (28)
- CAAF judges (2)
- CAAF oral argument audio (11)
- Capital courts-martial (46)
- CCAs (32)
- CLE/Events (13)
- collateral review (4)
- Court-martial news (69)
- habeas (5)
- MEJA (31)
- Military commissions (5)
- Military justice legislation (19)
- Military justice reform (18)
- MilJus Scholarship (22)
- New Article 120 (8)
- New CAAF opinions (40)
- New CCA opinions (47)
- Rants (9)
- SCOTUS MilJus Cases (64)
- TWIMJ (39)
- US SOFAs (16)
Contributors
Our contact information
You can reach us by email at:
caaflog@caaflog.com
caaflog@caaflog.com
Posts
2 comments:
Perhaps this is something that requires legislative action. A year ago I had a discussion with one of our CA ARNG chaplains who had just been listed as eligible for appointment an ad sep to which I was listed as a legal advisor.
He explained very well why chaplains on boards and courts is a bad idea. He viewed it as interfering with his open door to soldiers to have him seen as someone who punishes soldiers. And, this chaplain is a "conservative" guy.
Any update on this matter?
Post a Comment