![](http://bp1.blogger.com/_uHuXmx4E6XQ/Rtb6JwCah8I/AAAAAAAAABM/GJYc4kb_v4c/S240-s0-d/CAAFLOGonline.jpg)
![](http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_uHuXmx4E6XQ/SSL0qmhI61I/AAAAAAAAACw/LD-fSmp-q5k/S1600-R/caaf+(2).jpg)
Friday, December 15, 2006
Craig QP
Whether a harmless beyond a reasonable doubt analysis applies to a violation of an appellant's right to a speedy post-trial appeal, which is recognized as a constitutional due process right and is tested under an analysis that already includes the element of prejudice derived from Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 (1972).
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment