.jpg)
This week at the Supremes: No military justice developments are expected at the Supremes this week, though I wouldn't be surprised to see the SG seek and the Supremes grant an extension of the deadline for filing the SG's response that the Supremes called for in Rodriguez v. United States, No. 08-1465. (The response is due 15 July.)
This week at CAAF: CAAF has completed oral arguments for the term. The court will presumably decide all of its pending cases between now and 31 August. By my count, there are nine argued cases that have yet to be decided. It appears that CAAF will issue just 46 opinions of the court this term.
This week at the CCAs: Though it's not on AFCCA's online oral argument calendar, the court will hear oral argument in United States v. Seldes on Wednesday. Bill Cassara will argue for the appellant.
Military justice blogs are to blogs as military music is to music. The views expressed on this blog are offered in the contributors' personal capacity. They do not purport to be speaking for, and their views should not be imputed to, any other organization, agency, or entity.
Military justice research links
- 2008 Military Judges' Benchbook web site
- AFMAN 51-203, Records of Trial (1 Oct 1999)
- AFPD 51-2, Administration of Military Justice (7 Sep 1993)
- Air Force Instruction 51-201, Administration of Military Justice (21 Dec 07)
- Air Force Rules of Professional Conduct
- AR 27-10, Military Justice (16 Nov 2005)
- AR 27-26, Rules of Professional Conduct for Lawyers (1 May 1992)
- COMDTINST M5810.1D, Military Justice Manual (17 Aug 2000)
- Congressional Research Service, Statutory Interpretation: General Principles and Trends (March 30, 2006 ed.)
- Congressional Research Service, The Constitution of the United States of America, Analysis and Interpretation: Analysis of Cases Decided by the Supreme Court of the United States (2002) with 2006 supplement
- JAGINST 5803.1C, Professional Conduct of Attorneys Practicing Under the Cognizance and Supervision of the Judge Advocate General (9 Nov 04)
- JAGINST 5810.2A, Military Justice Regulations (17 Sep 93)
- JAGMAN, JAGINST 5800.7E (20 Jun 07)
- Law Library Microform Consortium, Military Law Collection
- LOC military law collection
- Manual for Courts-Martial (2008 ed.)
- Manual for Courts-Martial, United States (2005 ed.)
- Manual of the Judge Advocate General (JAGMAN), JAGINST 5800.7E (20 Jun 2007)
- Military Justice, Army Regulation 27-10 (16 Nov 2005)
- UCMJ (as of 28 Jan 2008)
Links
- ACCA's web site
- AFCCA's web site
- AIr Force Judge Advocate General's School's web site
- Air Force Law Review
- Army Lawyer
- Army Trial Judiciary's docket
- CAAF's web site
- CAAFlog.com
- CGCCA's web site
- Coast Guard trial and appellate dockets
- Court-Martial Trial Practice blog
- JAA American Inn of Court's web site
- JAA's web site
- JAG LAW Blog
- JAG Magazine [Navy]
- Journal of Military and Veteran Law
- Military Law Review
- Naval Law Review
- NIMJ's web site
- NJS's web site
- NMCCA's web site
- SCOTUSblog (aka, the greatest blog on the planet)
- Supreme Court's web site
- The Reporter [Air Force]
- This Court-Martial Sentences You To . . . [blog]
- TJAGLCS's web site
Blog archive
-
▼
2009
(520)
-
▼
July
(35)
- CAAFlog Has Moved
- New Home for CAAFlog
- CAAF News: which do you want first, the good news...
- CAAF issues opinion on IAC claim
- British Forces Face Same Challenges
- Upgrades
- June Army Lawyer online
- The end is near
- SG's time to reply to Rodriguez cert petition exte...
- This week in military justice -- 12 July 2009 edition
- Unpacking McCracken
- Bad press coverage
- New commentator joins the CAAFlog herd
- CAAF and commissions
- Quick McCracken observation
- New CAAF decision on CCA's authority to affirm an ...
- New CAAF opinion on detailing authority for defens...
- Volume 57 of Naval Law Review now online
- CAAF grants [revised]
- CAAF to hear oral argument on new Article 120's co...
- New Capital Court-Martial
- Marine Corps Times cover story on the Foster case
- Cox Commission hearing web cast available
- To quote David Bowie, ch-ch-ch-changes
- SASC wants to sic DOD IG on DON's appellate delay ...
- AFCCA denies recon and recon en banc in Nerad
- CAAF Rules Guide 13th
- This week in military justice -- 5 July 2009 editi...
- NIMJ files amicus brief supporting cert in Loving'...
- Rodriguez trailers: have I missed something?
- No Tweet Justice in Michigan
- CAAF opinion alert
- Marine found not guilty of violating order not to ...
- Rodriguez and computation of time
- CAAF grant
-
▼
July
(35)
Labels
- Admin (14)
- Architecture (2)
- Art. 2a10 (27)
- Article 125 (1)
- CAAF docket (41)
- CAAF grants (28)
- CAAF judges (2)
- CAAF oral argument audio (11)
- Capital courts-martial (46)
- CCAs (32)
- CLE/Events (13)
- collateral review (4)
- Court-martial news (69)
- habeas (5)
- MEJA (31)
- Military commissions (5)
- Military justice legislation (19)
- Military justice reform (18)
- MilJus Scholarship (22)
- New Article 120 (8)
- New CAAF opinions (40)
- New CCA opinions (47)
- Rants (9)
- SCOTUS MilJus Cases (64)
- TWIMJ (39)
- US SOFAs (16)
Contributors
Our contact information
You can reach us by email at:
caaflog@caaflog.com
caaflog@caaflog.com
Posts
8 comments:
Hopefully they won't grant an extension beyond 60 days.
Anyone know why CAAF takes the summer off? That Washington heat is something else, I guess. Wonder if the soldiers in Iraq or Afghanistan get time off for the heat or the sand storms.
Anon 0723 -- US SCT takes the summer off as well. Not sure what your point is.
The opinions C.A.A.F. put out are detailed, thoughtful, and clear. I wouldn't trade that for all the oral arguments in the world.
For those who miss oral argument season, I believe the audio archives are available for download.
I think anon 723 point was that they get more then enough days off in relation to that of the regular working man. Though CAAF could just be catching some kind of unnecessary grief that lawyers get. They need better pr: http://lawblog.legalmatch.com/2009/06/18/trusting-americas-lawyers/
CAAF also has numerous pending Motions, Petitions etc., that the Court must look at.
Aside from the Supreme Court, what other appellate court takes the summer off. Just saying. Our troops don't get the summer off.
Several of the circuits courts do the same thing.
Post a Comment