.jpg)
Wednesday, July 01, 2009
CAAF opinion alert
CAAF has issued its opinion in United States v. Paige, __ M.J. ___, No. 08-0805/MC (C.A.A.F. July 1, 2009).
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Military justice blogs are to blogs as military music is to music. The views expressed on this blog are offered in the contributors' personal capacity. They do not purport to be speaking for, and their views should not be imputed to, any other organization, agency, or entity.
Military justice research links
- 2008 Military Judges' Benchbook web site
- AFMAN 51-203, Records of Trial (1 Oct 1999)
- AFPD 51-2, Administration of Military Justice (7 Sep 1993)
- Air Force Instruction 51-201, Administration of Military Justice (21 Dec 07)
- Air Force Rules of Professional Conduct
- AR 27-10, Military Justice (16 Nov 2005)
- AR 27-26, Rules of Professional Conduct for Lawyers (1 May 1992)
- COMDTINST M5810.1D, Military Justice Manual (17 Aug 2000)
- Congressional Research Service, Statutory Interpretation: General Principles and Trends (March 30, 2006 ed.)
- Congressional Research Service, The Constitution of the United States of America, Analysis and Interpretation: Analysis of Cases Decided by the Supreme Court of the United States (2002) with 2006 supplement
- JAGINST 5803.1C, Professional Conduct of Attorneys Practicing Under the Cognizance and Supervision of the Judge Advocate General (9 Nov 04)
- JAGINST 5810.2A, Military Justice Regulations (17 Sep 93)
- JAGMAN, JAGINST 5800.7E (20 Jun 07)
- Law Library Microform Consortium, Military Law Collection
- LOC military law collection
- Manual for Courts-Martial (2008 ed.)
- Manual for Courts-Martial, United States (2005 ed.)
- Manual of the Judge Advocate General (JAGMAN), JAGINST 5800.7E (20 Jun 2007)
- Military Justice, Army Regulation 27-10 (16 Nov 2005)
- UCMJ (as of 28 Jan 2008)
Links
- ACCA's web site
- AFCCA's web site
- AIr Force Judge Advocate General's School's web site
- Air Force Law Review
- Army Lawyer
- Army Trial Judiciary's docket
- CAAF's web site
- CAAFlog.com
- CGCCA's web site
- Coast Guard trial and appellate dockets
- Court-Martial Trial Practice blog
- JAA American Inn of Court's web site
- JAA's web site
- JAG LAW Blog
- JAG Magazine [Navy]
- Journal of Military and Veteran Law
- Military Law Review
- Naval Law Review
- NIMJ's web site
- NJS's web site
- NMCCA's web site
- SCOTUSblog (aka, the greatest blog on the planet)
- Supreme Court's web site
- The Reporter [Air Force]
- This Court-Martial Sentences You To . . . [blog]
- TJAGLCS's web site
Blog archive
-
▼
2009
(520)
-
▼
July
(35)
- CAAFlog Has Moved
- New Home for CAAFlog
- CAAF News: which do you want first, the good news...
- CAAF issues opinion on IAC claim
- British Forces Face Same Challenges
- Upgrades
- June Army Lawyer online
- The end is near
- SG's time to reply to Rodriguez cert petition exte...
- This week in military justice -- 12 July 2009 edition
- Unpacking McCracken
- Bad press coverage
- New commentator joins the CAAFlog herd
- CAAF and commissions
- Quick McCracken observation
- New CAAF decision on CCA's authority to affirm an ...
- New CAAF opinion on detailing authority for defens...
- Volume 57 of Naval Law Review now online
- CAAF grants [revised]
- CAAF to hear oral argument on new Article 120's co...
- New Capital Court-Martial
- Marine Corps Times cover story on the Foster case
- Cox Commission hearing web cast available
- To quote David Bowie, ch-ch-ch-changes
- SASC wants to sic DOD IG on DON's appellate delay ...
- AFCCA denies recon and recon en banc in Nerad
- CAAF Rules Guide 13th
- This week in military justice -- 5 July 2009 editi...
- NIMJ files amicus brief supporting cert in Loving'...
- Rodriguez trailers: have I missed something?
- No Tweet Justice in Michigan
- CAAF opinion alert
- Marine found not guilty of violating order not to ...
- Rodriguez and computation of time
- CAAF grant
-
▼
July
(35)
Labels
- Admin (14)
- Architecture (2)
- Art. 2a10 (27)
- Article 125 (1)
- CAAF docket (41)
- CAAF grants (28)
- CAAF judges (2)
- CAAF oral argument audio (11)
- Capital courts-martial (46)
- CCAs (32)
- CLE/Events (13)
- collateral review (4)
- Court-martial news (69)
- habeas (5)
- MEJA (31)
- Military commissions (5)
- Military justice legislation (19)
- Military justice reform (18)
- MilJus Scholarship (22)
- New Article 120 (8)
- New CAAF opinions (40)
- New CCA opinions (47)
- Rants (9)
- SCOTUS MilJus Cases (64)
- TWIMJ (39)
- US SOFAs (16)
Contributors
Our contact information
You can reach us by email at:
caaflog@caaflog.com
caaflog@caaflog.com
Posts
8 comments:
"The defense turned the trial into a referendum on the credibility of the Government's witnesses . . ." (Stucky, J., dissenting).
If the government is going to send me to jail I certainly want to question their credibility, whether it's characterized as a referendum or otherwise.
Not long before some overzealous TC cites this language in arguing to a military judge that we shouldn't have a "referendum on credibility." Dumb, dumb, dumb.
Two problems, Anon 1805:
1. (Most) trial counsel, and particularly the overzealous ones, don;t read appellate decisions.
2. Nobody cares at a court-martial what one judge said in a cioncurring/dissenting opinion.
Are you sure about that? Have personally seen TC's extol the virtues of Crawford, J., dissenting.
Uncontastjudidicated evidence. Good to see trial counsel can spell at a junior high school level.
Hey man-
"Uncontastjudidicated!"
I like it. But I am not sure I can use it in a sentence.
I like incontastjudicated too. I also like making fun of trial counsel. But I have no idea where this word, and thus the joke about trial counsel, came from.
Paige at 11-12. Not quite as bad as commentators made it out to be, but hey.
paige at 11-12 was a little overplayed.
Post a Comment