.jpg)
I just saw my first Jury Duty stamp, which the post office website states was released two months ago. It depicts 12 profiles of heads in various colors all facing to the right, with the words "JURY DUTY Serve with Pride."
Maybe the post office should also release one to honor duty as a court-martial panel member - show only 5 profiles, make it postcard rate (to reflect the fewer numbers), and use it as a PSA to avoid that sleeping panel member issue by stating on the stamp "PANEL DUTY Serve Alert." But no need to change the direction of the heads.
Military justice blogs are to blogs as military music is to music. The views expressed on this blog are offered in the contributors' personal capacity. They do not purport to be speaking for, and their views should not be imputed to, any other organization, agency, or entity.
Military justice research links
- 2008 Military Judges' Benchbook web site
- AFMAN 51-203, Records of Trial (1 Oct 1999)
- AFPD 51-2, Administration of Military Justice (7 Sep 1993)
- Air Force Instruction 51-201, Administration of Military Justice (21 Dec 07)
- Air Force Rules of Professional Conduct
- AR 27-10, Military Justice (16 Nov 2005)
- AR 27-26, Rules of Professional Conduct for Lawyers (1 May 1992)
- COMDTINST M5810.1D, Military Justice Manual (17 Aug 2000)
- Congressional Research Service, Statutory Interpretation: General Principles and Trends (March 30, 2006 ed.)
- Congressional Research Service, The Constitution of the United States of America, Analysis and Interpretation: Analysis of Cases Decided by the Supreme Court of the United States (2002) with 2006 supplement
- JAGINST 5803.1C, Professional Conduct of Attorneys Practicing Under the Cognizance and Supervision of the Judge Advocate General (9 Nov 04)
- JAGINST 5810.2A, Military Justice Regulations (17 Sep 93)
- JAGMAN, JAGINST 5800.7E (20 Jun 07)
- Law Library Microform Consortium, Military Law Collection
- LOC military law collection
- Manual for Courts-Martial (2008 ed.)
- Manual for Courts-Martial, United States (2005 ed.)
- Manual of the Judge Advocate General (JAGMAN), JAGINST 5800.7E (20 Jun 2007)
- Military Justice, Army Regulation 27-10 (16 Nov 2005)
- UCMJ (as of 28 Jan 2008)
Links
- ACCA's web site
- AFCCA's web site
- AIr Force Judge Advocate General's School's web site
- Air Force Law Review
- Army Lawyer
- Army Trial Judiciary's docket
- CAAF's web site
- CAAFlog.com
- CGCCA's web site
- Coast Guard trial and appellate dockets
- Court-Martial Trial Practice blog
- JAA American Inn of Court's web site
- JAA's web site
- JAG LAW Blog
- JAG Magazine [Navy]
- Journal of Military and Veteran Law
- Military Law Review
- Naval Law Review
- NIMJ's web site
- NJS's web site
- NMCCA's web site
- SCOTUSblog (aka, the greatest blog on the planet)
- Supreme Court's web site
- The Reporter [Air Force]
- This Court-Martial Sentences You To . . . [blog]
- TJAGLCS's web site
Blog archive
-
▼
2007
(657)
-
▼
November
(53)
- Brown's essence
- AF JAG certifies CA reassessment issue
- First opinion of the Term
- Additional briefing ordered in Larson -- UPDATED
- SG's opposition in Foerster
- You can't spell CCA without A-C-C
- Still can't see the Foerster
- A civilian analog to Article 66 review
- Duty, Duty, Duty
- MCM hijinks
- Capital writ appeal
- Another addendum sjar non-service grant
- Does the SCRA tolling provision apply during perio...
- Beware the Navy JAG Corps web site's reading room
- Just call me Sir Links-a-lot
- Shakespearian anagrams
- Get the lead out of military justice
- Another interesting but enigmatic daily journal entry
- 20 minutes of fame
- Maybe Army GAD can represent the mid-Atlantic stat...
- Three more summary decisions from C Double A F
- Would they have held a seance if the author judge ...
- Another CAAFlog contest
- Is it a conflict for an accused to be represented ...
- Another big news day in the NCAA and the C Double A F
- An SJA's handling of clemency matters
- Challenge to former military judge serving as SJA
- CAAF to review two member challenge cases
- CAAF to resolve service split over sentencing evid...
- Six new granted cases
- New published AFCCA opinion
- Granted providence inquiry issue
- Jurisdictionpalooza
- New CAAF grant
- CAAF's focus on its own jurisdictional limitations...
- Pumping out the pubs
- Hakuna Watada
- Not a unitary Code of Military Justice
- Another stealth published NMCCA decision
- CAAF grants review of Mil. R. Evid. 807 issues
- Complicated but fascinating issue
- Two steps forward, one step back
- Garcia still on Supremes' docket
- Cert denied in jurisdictionless case
- Why Condi Rice Needs a Trip to Pier 1
- Summer in C'ville
- Problems at Defense Forensics Computer Laboratory
- To quote John Denver, I'm leaving on a jet plane
- One more stat
- Crunching some federal civilian criminal numbers
- Best chance of relief?
- ACCA answers the age-old question of whether surre...
- A limited time offer
-
▼
November
(53)
Labels
- Admin (14)
- Architecture (2)
- Art. 2a10 (27)
- Article 125 (1)
- CAAF docket (41)
- CAAF grants (28)
- CAAF judges (2)
- CAAF oral argument audio (11)
- Capital courts-martial (46)
- CCAs (32)
- CLE/Events (13)
- collateral review (4)
- Court-martial news (69)
- habeas (5)
- MEJA (31)
- Military commissions (5)
- Military justice legislation (19)
- Military justice reform (18)
- MilJus Scholarship (22)
- New Article 120 (8)
- New CAAF opinions (40)
- New CCA opinions (47)
- Rants (9)
- SCOTUS MilJus Cases (64)
- TWIMJ (39)
- US SOFAs (16)
Contributors
Our contact information
You can reach us by email at:
caaflog@caaflog.com
caaflog@caaflog.com
Posts
2 comments:
"[S]how only 5 profiles, make it postcard rate (to reflect the fewer numbers)"
What??? What self-respecting TC ever ends up with a penel of five? I know not everyone agrees, but I was always a big believer in playing the numbers. I hoped to have 8 after challenges for cause at a GCM, and 5 aftere challenges for cause at a SpCM, and then I would take my peremptory to leave the DC with the choice of kicking someone off (and giving me the best mathematical number) or forgoing his peremptory.
Maybe with the panel duty stamp, you would only have to pay two-thirds of the postage and the government mails the letter anyway.
Post a Comment