Friday, November 17, 2006
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Military justice blogs are to blogs as military music is to music. The views expressed on this blog are offered in the contributors' personal capacity. They do not purport to be speaking for, and their views should not be imputed to, any other organization, agency, or entity.
1 comment:
And these are two very interesting issues in the immediate future.
Tuesday, November 28, 2006
9:00 a.m.: United States v. Danyel D. Green, No. 06-0520/AR
(Appellee) (Appellant)
Counsel for Appellant: Maj Billy B. Ruhling, JA, USA
Counsel for Appellee: Capt Edward E. Wiggers, JA, USA
Case Summary: GCM conviction of maltreatment, false official statement, indecent assault, soliciting adultery, and adultery. Granted issue questions whether the military judge violated Appellant’s due process rights when he sentenced him based upon his personal religious beliefs rather than legitimate sentencing principles.
Wednesday, November 29, 2006
9:00 a.m.: United States v. James A. Wise, No. 06-0610/AR
(Appellee) (Appellant)
Counsel for Appellant: Maj Billy B. Ruhling, JA, USA
Counsel for Appellee: Capt Magdalena A. Acevedo, JA, USA
Case Summary: SPCM conviction for false official statement, use of a controlled substance, and distribution of a controlled substance. Granted issue questions whether Appellant’s confinement conditions, including and in particular with respect to his claim of having been confined with enemy prisoners of war in Iraq, were unlawful, and whether, in the context presented, Appellant forfeited his claims of unlawful post-trial punishment by failing to exhaust his administrative remedies under United States v. White, 54 M.J. 469 (C.A.A.F. 2001).
Post a Comment