.jpg)
A Congressional Research Service report called, "Supreme Court Appellate Jurisdiction Over Military Court Cases," issued on 6 October, is available here.
(h/t: NBM3)
Military justice blogs are to blogs as military music is to music. The views expressed on this blog are offered in the contributors' personal capacity. They do not purport to be speaking for, and their views should not be imputed to, any other organization, agency, or entity.
Military justice research links
- 2008 Military Judges' Benchbook web site
- AFMAN 51-203, Records of Trial (1 Oct 1999)
- AFPD 51-2, Administration of Military Justice (7 Sep 1993)
- Air Force Instruction 51-201, Administration of Military Justice (21 Dec 07)
- Air Force Rules of Professional Conduct
- AR 27-10, Military Justice (16 Nov 2005)
- AR 27-26, Rules of Professional Conduct for Lawyers (1 May 1992)
- COMDTINST M5810.1D, Military Justice Manual (17 Aug 2000)
- Congressional Research Service, Statutory Interpretation: General Principles and Trends (March 30, 2006 ed.)
- Congressional Research Service, The Constitution of the United States of America, Analysis and Interpretation: Analysis of Cases Decided by the Supreme Court of the United States (2002) with 2006 supplement
- JAGINST 5803.1C, Professional Conduct of Attorneys Practicing Under the Cognizance and Supervision of the Judge Advocate General (9 Nov 04)
- JAGINST 5810.2A, Military Justice Regulations (17 Sep 93)
- JAGMAN, JAGINST 5800.7E (20 Jun 07)
- Law Library Microform Consortium, Military Law Collection
- LOC military law collection
- Manual for Courts-Martial (2008 ed.)
- Manual for Courts-Martial, United States (2005 ed.)
- Manual of the Judge Advocate General (JAGMAN), JAGINST 5800.7E (20 Jun 2007)
- Military Justice, Army Regulation 27-10 (16 Nov 2005)
- UCMJ (as of 28 Jan 2008)
Links
- ACCA's web site
- AFCCA's web site
- AIr Force Judge Advocate General's School's web site
- Air Force Law Review
- Army Lawyer
- Army Trial Judiciary's docket
- CAAF's web site
- CAAFlog.com
- CGCCA's web site
- Coast Guard trial and appellate dockets
- Court-Martial Trial Practice blog
- JAA American Inn of Court's web site
- JAA's web site
- JAG LAW Blog
- JAG Magazine [Navy]
- Journal of Military and Veteran Law
- Military Law Review
- Naval Law Review
- NIMJ's web site
- NJS's web site
- NMCCA's web site
- SCOTUSblog (aka, the greatest blog on the planet)
- Supreme Court's web site
- The Reporter [Air Force]
- This Court-Martial Sentences You To . . . [blog]
- TJAGLCS's web site
Blog archive
-
▼
2008
(813)
-
▼
October
(58)
- Mistrial motion denied in Martinez case
- Court-martial follies
- CAAF grants review of victim impact evidence issue
- Commentary on Watada
- Denedo -- what next?
- Military [j]ustice news
- Drawing a new Mendoza line: corrected CA actions ...
- To quote Tone Loc, funky cold Medina
- To quote the Beach Boys, be true to your school
- More thoughts about the Denedo opposition
- Big news day
- Denedo opposition
- Padding the bill: The CBO issues what looks like ...
- Denedo opposition to cert filed
- Resource Alert: Naval Law Review Back Online
- WARNING: The Surgeon General has determined that ...
- The Conscience of a Lawyer
- Is timely post-trial review a right without a remedy?
- October issue of Army Lawyer online
- USDC Grants Watada Injunction on 3 of 5 Charges
- The Ever Changing Iraqi SOFA
- Update on Iraqi SOFA - Cushions May Get Harder
- Caveat LEXIS?
- "DIG We Must"
- New contributor
- Online military justice journal invites submissions
- Hamdan Pre-trial Confinement Issue Papers
- Trick or treat
- CAAF disposes of third orally argued case
- Hamdan's Pre-Trial Confinement: Gov't Says Not So ...
- Uncomfortable SOFA
- CAAFlog exclusive: new published AFCCA opinion [U...
- CAAF issues this term's first opinion of the court
- Capital court-martial sitrep
- Interesting article
- Garner's work is never done
- Grants
- Some thoughts on the new NMCCA courtroom
- WaPo article posits that the Bush Administration i...
- Congressional Research Service issues report on SC...
- SG waives response in Ryan
- CAAF already decides a case argued this term
- New issue of JAG magazine online
- Court Martial News - Monday, now Tuesday, Roundup
- What does CAAF cite?
- CAAF declines to stop post-trial processing in Ali
- Cert denied
- The Supremes denied cert in Stevenson
- CAAF flips Phillippe -- again
- ACCA analyzes Military Rule of Evidence 804(b)(6)
- Ryan cert petition redocketed
- New published ACCA decision
- New article on Article 119a
- NMCCA early warning system down
- Clouds on Stevenson's horizon
- A Westerbergian analysis of Kennedy v. Louisiana
- Yet another factual error in Kennedy v. Louisiana
- Kennedy v. La. - No Joy for Louisiana in Military ...
-
▼
October
(58)
Labels
- Admin (14)
- Architecture (2)
- Art. 2a10 (27)
- Article 125 (1)
- CAAF docket (41)
- CAAF grants (28)
- CAAF judges (2)
- CAAF oral argument audio (11)
- Capital courts-martial (46)
- CCAs (32)
- CLE/Events (13)
- collateral review (4)
- Court-martial news (69)
- habeas (5)
- MEJA (31)
- Military commissions (5)
- Military justice legislation (19)
- Military justice reform (18)
- MilJus Scholarship (22)
- New Article 120 (8)
- New CAAF opinions (40)
- New CCA opinions (47)
- Rants (9)
- SCOTUS MilJus Cases (64)
- TWIMJ (39)
- US SOFAs (16)
Contributors
Our contact information
You can reach us by email at:
caaflog@caaflog.com
caaflog@caaflog.com
Posts
2 comments:
The parenthetical summary of Weiss in n.31 is wrong.
Nor is Marcum the right case for the author to illustrate that some Supreme Court precedent may be wholly inapplicable at CAAF, as she asserts at p. 5.
This case does not say that Lawrence is inapplicable in the military context, but rather that Marcum's conduct fell outside of the Lawrence-zone of protected liberty interests. In fact, CAAF gave Lawrence a more generous reading -- asserting that it applied mid-level scrutiny requiring searching constitutional inquiry -- than some Article III Courts which have held that the Lawrence right is to be evaluated under rational basis review.
Maybe not the best research paper to hand over to the legislature.
Post a Comment