.jpg)
The Navy JAG Corps has established a military justice litigation career track. Oddly enough, the instruction setting up the program, JAGINST 1150.2 (3 May 2007), isn't available on the Navy JAG Corps web site's Navy JAG Instructions and COMNAVLEGSVCOM Instructions page. But in keeping with CAAFlog's constant quest to be helpful to our readers, we provide a link to the instruction on our new web page.
The program allows those meeting certain criteria to apply to be designated as military justice litigation experts or specialists, and most high-level military justice jobs are reserved for those who have been so designated (though, if I read the instruction correctly, a military justice litigation designation isn't necessary to be assigned as an NMCCA judge). The program is also expressly advertised as a means of ensuring that military justice specialists are competitive for promotion.
The deadline for receipt of applications is 12 October.
Does any other service recognize a comparable specialty?
Military justice blogs are to blogs as military music is to music. The views expressed on this blog are offered in the contributors' personal capacity. They do not purport to be speaking for, and their views should not be imputed to, any other organization, agency, or entity.
Military justice research links
- 2008 Military Judges' Benchbook web site
- AFMAN 51-203, Records of Trial (1 Oct 1999)
- AFPD 51-2, Administration of Military Justice (7 Sep 1993)
- Air Force Instruction 51-201, Administration of Military Justice (21 Dec 07)
- Air Force Rules of Professional Conduct
- AR 27-10, Military Justice (16 Nov 2005)
- AR 27-26, Rules of Professional Conduct for Lawyers (1 May 1992)
- COMDTINST M5810.1D, Military Justice Manual (17 Aug 2000)
- Congressional Research Service, Statutory Interpretation: General Principles and Trends (March 30, 2006 ed.)
- Congressional Research Service, The Constitution of the United States of America, Analysis and Interpretation: Analysis of Cases Decided by the Supreme Court of the United States (2002) with 2006 supplement
- JAGINST 5803.1C, Professional Conduct of Attorneys Practicing Under the Cognizance and Supervision of the Judge Advocate General (9 Nov 04)
- JAGINST 5810.2A, Military Justice Regulations (17 Sep 93)
- JAGMAN, JAGINST 5800.7E (20 Jun 07)
- Law Library Microform Consortium, Military Law Collection
- LOC military law collection
- Manual for Courts-Martial (2008 ed.)
- Manual for Courts-Martial, United States (2005 ed.)
- Manual of the Judge Advocate General (JAGMAN), JAGINST 5800.7E (20 Jun 2007)
- Military Justice, Army Regulation 27-10 (16 Nov 2005)
- UCMJ (as of 28 Jan 2008)
Links
- ACCA's web site
- AFCCA's web site
- AIr Force Judge Advocate General's School's web site
- Air Force Law Review
- Army Lawyer
- Army Trial Judiciary's docket
- CAAF's web site
- CAAFlog.com
- CGCCA's web site
- Coast Guard trial and appellate dockets
- Court-Martial Trial Practice blog
- JAA American Inn of Court's web site
- JAA's web site
- JAG LAW Blog
- JAG Magazine [Navy]
- Journal of Military and Veteran Law
- Military Law Review
- Naval Law Review
- NIMJ's web site
- NJS's web site
- NMCCA's web site
- SCOTUSblog (aka, the greatest blog on the planet)
- Supreme Court's web site
- The Reporter [Air Force]
- This Court-Martial Sentences You To . . . [blog]
- TJAGLCS's web site
Blog archive
-
▼
2007
(657)
-
▼
August
(55)
- It's alive!
- LTC Jordan describes his encounter with the milita...
- Navy JAG Corps solicits applicants for military ju...
- Shining a spotlight on the SJA
- Military legal publications
- CAAF continuously considers Crawford
- United States v. Jordan sentencing hearing
- Verdict in Abu Ghraib Trial of Lt Col Jordan
- Pick of the Week: Ashby and Schweitzer headed back...
- Upcoming training
- I don't understand the used book market
- New military justice case book
- Inappropriate sentence appropriateness standard
- New NMCCA published decision
- For your reading pleasure
- LtGen Mattis's letter dismissing charges in United...
- Considering H.R. 3174
- Poly-Dockets
- From the Hall of Henry L. (Two) to the Hall of Ant...
- The Halls of Justice
- Serving the addendum SJAR on the defense
- Resource alert
- Now HERE is an issue presented!
- A right to all or nothing?
- Is materiality of the falsehood an element of frau...
- Final accounting of pay and personal jurisdiction
- Mil. R. Evid. 1006 case -- Yes!
- CAAF grants review in HIV assault case
- Findings reversed due to erroneous ruling on membe...
- Busy day in military justice land
- EGAD! Government concedes Wilson?
- 15 minutes of fame
- Can we all please agree to serve the addendum SJAR...
- Sodomy trailer cases
- Unreserved jurisdiction
- All Gonzalez All the Time
- SG waives response to pro se IFP Marine cert petition
- Six Degrees of Cass Sunstein
- "Above all . . ." Don't Forget Grostefon
- The Sacramentorium adds a blogger
- Gonzalez puzzler
- Remove Quinn-Monreal from the deserter list
- Interesting analysis of Marcum/Don't Ask, Don't Tell
- SG waives right to respond in Monette
- More on Colonel Murphy's writ
- Pro se Marine Corps cert petition
- NMCCA partially terminates its UA
- April fools!
- All things reconsidered revisted -- again
- H.R. 3174 update
- CAAF orientation session for newly reported appell...
- Update pending
- All things reconsidered revisited
- The Air Force Court posted 2 published opinions today
- The Pro Se and the In Forma Pauperis (with apologi...
-
▼
August
(55)
Labels
- Admin (14)
- Architecture (2)
- Art. 2a10 (27)
- Article 125 (1)
- CAAF docket (41)
- CAAF grants (28)
- CAAF judges (2)
- CAAF oral argument audio (11)
- Capital courts-martial (46)
- CCAs (32)
- CLE/Events (13)
- collateral review (4)
- Court-martial news (69)
- habeas (5)
- MEJA (31)
- Military commissions (5)
- Military justice legislation (19)
- Military justice reform (18)
- MilJus Scholarship (22)
- New Article 120 (8)
- New CAAF opinions (40)
- New CCA opinions (47)
- Rants (9)
- SCOTUS MilJus Cases (64)
- TWIMJ (39)
- US SOFAs (16)
Contributors
Our contact information
You can reach us by email at:
caaflog@caaflog.com
caaflog@caaflog.com
Posts
2 comments:
I'm not sure what I think of this yet...while the advantages are obvious for anyone who wants to specialize in military justice, it's not clear what impact, if any, this will have on those who choose NOT to pursue the military justice career track. I also wonder if this career track doesn't create a disincentive for specialists to volunteer for deployments and other hard-to-fill billets? Promotion and detailing are the current incentives to do that sort of thing--does this change that equation?
I think this is a great idea. Most folks I know who have gotten out, as well as myself here in the near future, seperate due to military system of pushing litigators into non-litigation positions. If I knew I would have a shot at avoiding the deputy, SJA track, and could remain in a courtroom (my personal passion), then perhaps we'd have some happier miiltary members who would additionally be highly competent.
Post a Comment