.jpg)
There was quite a bit of military justice activity at the Supreme Court today. The Supremes denied Salvador Diaz's petition seeking rehearing on the Supremes' denial of his cert petition. And the Supremes denied the pro se cert petition in Perez v. United States, No. 06-10998. (Today's Order List is here.)
As Fitz previously indicated, a cert petition in Cossio v. United States, No. 06-1568, was docketed. CAAF rejected an Article 10 speedy trial issue below in a unanimous three-judge decision written by Judge Erdmann. United States v. Cossio, 64 M.J. 254 (C.A.A.F. 2007). Let the Cossio watch begin!
Military justice blogs are to blogs as military music is to music. The views expressed on this blog are offered in the contributors' personal capacity. They do not purport to be speaking for, and their views should not be imputed to, any other organization, agency, or entity.
Military justice research links
- 2008 Military Judges' Benchbook web site
- AFMAN 51-203, Records of Trial (1 Oct 1999)
- AFPD 51-2, Administration of Military Justice (7 Sep 1993)
- Air Force Instruction 51-201, Administration of Military Justice (21 Dec 07)
- Air Force Rules of Professional Conduct
- AR 27-10, Military Justice (16 Nov 2005)
- AR 27-26, Rules of Professional Conduct for Lawyers (1 May 1992)
- COMDTINST M5810.1D, Military Justice Manual (17 Aug 2000)
- Congressional Research Service, Statutory Interpretation: General Principles and Trends (March 30, 2006 ed.)
- Congressional Research Service, The Constitution of the United States of America, Analysis and Interpretation: Analysis of Cases Decided by the Supreme Court of the United States (2002) with 2006 supplement
- JAGINST 5803.1C, Professional Conduct of Attorneys Practicing Under the Cognizance and Supervision of the Judge Advocate General (9 Nov 04)
- JAGINST 5810.2A, Military Justice Regulations (17 Sep 93)
- JAGMAN, JAGINST 5800.7E (20 Jun 07)
- Law Library Microform Consortium, Military Law Collection
- LOC military law collection
- Manual for Courts-Martial (2008 ed.)
- Manual for Courts-Martial, United States (2005 ed.)
- Manual of the Judge Advocate General (JAGMAN), JAGINST 5800.7E (20 Jun 2007)
- Military Justice, Army Regulation 27-10 (16 Nov 2005)
- UCMJ (as of 28 Jan 2008)
Links
- ACCA's web site
- AFCCA's web site
- AIr Force Judge Advocate General's School's web site
- Air Force Law Review
- Army Lawyer
- Army Trial Judiciary's docket
- CAAF's web site
- CAAFlog.com
- CGCCA's web site
- Coast Guard trial and appellate dockets
- Court-Martial Trial Practice blog
- JAA American Inn of Court's web site
- JAA's web site
- JAG LAW Blog
- JAG Magazine [Navy]
- Journal of Military and Veteran Law
- Military Law Review
- Naval Law Review
- NIMJ's web site
- NJS's web site
- NMCCA's web site
- SCOTUSblog (aka, the greatest blog on the planet)
- Supreme Court's web site
- The Reporter [Air Force]
- This Court-Martial Sentences You To . . . [blog]
- TJAGLCS's web site
Blog archive
-
▼
2007
(657)
-
▼
May
(51)
- New grant
- You beat me, No Man
- Examining Military Rule of Evidence 414
- For Guert fans only (but that's everyone, right?)
- US v. Schroder: Justice and a Moonlight Sonata
- Big news day
- CAAFlog Talk, with Linda Richman returns
- New CAAF grant
- The Cossio watch
- Summer reading list
- Resource alert
- The CAAFlog pop quiz
- CAAF grants petition
- Do not go directly to CAAF; do not collect writ of...
- Stay denied in Lopez de Victoria
- New AF cert petition
- Two new cert petitions
- New CAAF opinion
- Professor Lichtman, the JO'C is on you
- CGCCA creates massive service split
- CCA Update
- Blogging from the CAAF Conference: Art. 2(a)(10), ...
- Loss of former USDB Commandant
- SCOTUS update
- Resource alert
- 10 May is Obstruction of Justice Day at the Navy Yard
- New published NMCCA opinion
- Interesting unpublished AFCCA opinion rejecting Ar...
- Schweitzer addendum
- Schweitzer opinion
- Stealth Schweitzer opinion
- Article 62 appeal appeal
- SCOTUS update update
- SCOTUS update
- May is Mathews month
- The Coast Guard Court returns
- Is mistake of fact as to age a possible defense in...
- New published ACCA decision in Article 62 appeal
- Resource alert
- Coast Guard Court continues to be anti-social
- New published AFCCA decision
- Another new CAAF opinion
- New CAAF opinion
- Will 3-2 be the new 4-1?
- SCOTUS update: whoops; I goofed
- The Diaz case just won't die
- Adcock: a typo most foul and a slope too slippery ...
- New CAAF opinion
- CAAF is still in business
- Overlooked published NMCCA opinion
- Interesting Daily Journal entry
-
▼
May
(51)
Labels
- Admin (14)
- Architecture (2)
- Art. 2a10 (27)
- Article 125 (1)
- CAAF docket (41)
- CAAF grants (28)
- CAAF judges (2)
- CAAF oral argument audio (11)
- Capital courts-martial (46)
- CCAs (32)
- CLE/Events (13)
- collateral review (4)
- Court-martial news (69)
- habeas (5)
- MEJA (31)
- Military commissions (5)
- Military justice legislation (19)
- Military justice reform (18)
- MilJus Scholarship (22)
- New Article 120 (8)
- New CAAF opinions (40)
- New CCA opinions (47)
- Rants (9)
- SCOTUS MilJus Cases (64)
- TWIMJ (39)
- US SOFAs (16)
Contributors
Our contact information
You can reach us by email at:
caaflog@caaflog.com
caaflog@caaflog.com
Posts
4 comments:
Allow me to write the entire Cossio watch now to save CAAFlog the time:
1 Jun: CAAFlog speculates about chances of writ's success at SCOTUS. States this one might get a grant because of the over-arching issues of general interest in the case.
4 Jun: CAAFlog posts schedule for writ's denial, er um conference.
7 Jun: other commentators join in the Cossio love fest and give the writ a snowball's chance in hell of success.
10 Jun: While pounding on thhe wall for the hapless LCDR/Major/CDR/LtCol in the next office to come talk to him about the intricacies of his money ball theory of how Cossio will be granted, CAAFlog's historical collection of Bluebook's (the Clipper's collection on loan while he is in country) and briefs of every successful military SCOTUS case in the last 10 years (it's a small office) fall and hit him on the head. The blow knocks some sense into him and he admits on the blog that there is a possibility Cossio won't be granted review.
20 Jun?: Cossio petition denied. Just to rile CAAFlog, a CAAFlog reader and SCOTUS clerk (talk about someone that needs some sense knocked into them) convinces Justice Thomas to write a concurrence asking all military counsel to give up SCOTUS practice because "we just don't review those silly military cases."
New action on US v. Me (Cossio):
Jun 5 2007 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 21, 2007.
Post a Comment