Thursday, October 12, 2006

United States v. Lane in fast lane?

In an update to my on-going debate with the good Col, I would like to point out that there was no petition for reconsideration filed, at least by 4 Oct 06, and because the case was decided on 20 Sep 06, I think we are out of time. Petitions for reconsideration often seemed to be used to buy the government more time to consider a cert petition. So either the Air Force has already decided to go to the SG and doesn't need more time and Lane is on the fast-track, or maybe the government is less upset about this decision than the Col might believe.

Or, of course, they just blew the date. Happens to the best of us.

2 comments:

Dwight Sullivan said...

If the government side is thinking about this issue hyper-strategically, a request for reconsideration might be ruled out for fear that CAAF might take the "harmless error" route, thus eliminating the S.G.'s opportunity to ask the Supremes to rule that a Member of Congress CAN simultaneously serve as a military reserve officer, including in such a billet as an appellate judge. See my earlier post on a zebra theory of jurisprudence.

Besides, the S.G. fairly routinely requests -- and the Supremes routinely grant -- additional time to consider whether to file a cert petition.

The countdown is on. My guess is that within 90 days of 20 Sep, we will see a request from the S.G. for additional time.

Damn that rule against betting with subordinates!

--Dwight Sullivan

The JAG Hunter said...

The JAG Hunter may be of interest to you: http://jaghunters.blogspotl.com

Best regards,
Walter Francis Fitzpatrick, III
USN (Retired)
The JAG Hunter