tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34853720.post2197606474064286758..comments2023-08-24T10:39:23.460-04:00Comments on CAAFlog: CAAF grantDwight Sullivanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11657981110237418710noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34853720.post-91272919367337293672009-03-18T09:46:00.000-04:002009-03-18T09:46:00.000-04:00Actually either the opinion from the Army Court is...Actually either the opinion from the Army Court is incorrect in describing the posture of the case at trial or the question presented to CAAF is incorrect. It appears to be the latter. It is curious that CAAF did not modify the question presented before granting on the issue.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34853720.post-71905859419871186072009-03-18T08:59:00.000-04:002009-03-18T08:59:00.000-04:00It is just another look at the "closely related of...It is just another look at the "closely related offense" doctrine. Affirming convictions based on elements not found by previous fact finder- the MJ- in this mixed plea case.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34853720.post-11649272246601005002009-03-17T21:18:00.000-04:002009-03-17T21:18:00.000-04:00Morton was a guilty plea...there was no "trier of ...Morton was a guilty plea...there was no "trier of fact"...what the hell's going on here?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com