tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34853720.comments2023-08-24T10:39:23.460-04:00CAAFlogDwight Sullivanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11657981110237418710noreply@blogger.comBlogger8496125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34853720.post-73806191945628185642009-07-15T20:49:55.789-04:002009-07-15T20:49:55.789-04:00Not that I would have found IAC in this case, but ...Not that I would have found IAC in this case, but it never ceases to frustrate how high a bar we as a profession place on IAC.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34853720.post-51570017168409654422009-07-15T08:23:47.261-04:002009-07-15T08:23:47.261-04:00The link to the Benchbook on the right side under ...The link to the Benchbook on the right side under research links is broken. Looks like the Army rearranged their website.<br /><br />You also have two links to the Navy JAGMAN.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34853720.post-46250293708604447602009-07-15T07:44:30.414-04:002009-07-15T07:44:30.414-04:00I thought CAAFlog contributes to society as milita...I thought CAAFlog contributes to society as military music contributes to music...or something to that effect.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34853720.post-37841565097470452802009-07-14T22:57:55.812-04:002009-07-14T22:57:55.812-04:00Cossio:
Thanks for the compliment, I never knew y...Cossio:<br /><br />Thanks for the compliment, I never knew you thought that CAAFlog contributed to society. Thanks again.<br /><br />All others:<br /><br />Just in case you were wondering, no we will not be located at CAAFlog's email address. Our new address will be www.caaflog.com. Easier and simpler.Mike "No Man" Navarrehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11434921480452541955noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34853720.post-11353557238415500902009-07-14T22:37:35.553-04:002009-07-14T22:37:35.553-04:00"Hopefully posters will simply be honest - bu..."Hopefully posters will simply be honest - but, brutality abounds on some of the CAAFlog's threads."<br /><br /><b>"I SAY, I SAY, I RESEMBLE THAT REMARK !!!"</b><br /><br />- Foghorn Leghorn<br /><br />It's good to see a young JAG with real-life skills* other than sophristry.<br /><br /><br />*"Real-Life Skills are defined as skills that contribute to society (i.e. Construction, Web Design, Craftsman) other than Jobs which serve little purpose in advancing the human race, (ie. Lawyer, Broker, Hedge Fund Manager, Liberal Politician)Cossiohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14096670749657701418noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34853720.post-38330598546250936112009-07-14T18:28:41.312-04:002009-07-14T18:28:41.312-04:00Brutality? Sheesh. We do see lameness and brilli...Brutality? Sheesh. We do see lameness and brilliance interspersed with wit in abundance, but brutality? Naw.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34853720.post-23318050630824415722009-07-14T18:19:29.234-04:002009-07-14T18:19:29.234-04:00Honesty? Ha, when will that ever happen??Honesty? Ha, when will that ever happen??Tenrou Ugetsuhttp://www.legalmatch.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34853720.post-23597713222287816312009-07-14T13:20:46.391-04:002009-07-14T13:20:46.391-04:00Foster is supposed to be dead. United States v. M...Foster is supposed to be dead. United States v. Miller, 67 M.J. 385 (10 Jun 2009)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34853720.post-18168466418785151582009-07-14T13:11:35.213-04:002009-07-14T13:11:35.213-04:00My eyes must be deceiving me...I suppose now you t...My eyes must be deceiving me...I suppose now you truly do have a greater responsibility than I can fathom! <br /><br />And since when do you go by Zachary?Still not workingnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34853720.post-22831955016792137862009-07-14T11:51:08.549-04:002009-07-14T11:51:08.549-04:00Zachary,
Hopefully posters will simply be hones...Zachary,<br /> Hopefully posters will simply be honest - but, brutality abounds on some of the CAAFlog's threads.<br /><br /> Thanks in advance for your contributions.Dew_Processhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12952551772411097184noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34853720.post-58975562064704787812009-07-14T10:51:59.737-04:002009-07-14T10:51:59.737-04:00Didn't Weymouth, Foster, and Oatney answer mos...Didn't Weymouth, Foster, and Oatney answer most of Judge Baker's LIO questions?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34853720.post-15184202408669331752009-07-14T08:57:55.460-04:002009-07-14T08:57:55.460-04:00Repent?Repent?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34853720.post-4914456076450497852009-07-14T08:50:58.895-04:002009-07-14T08:50:58.895-04:00I fear change.I fear change.Bill Cnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34853720.post-5000511141195369382009-07-14T03:44:07.393-04:002009-07-14T03:44:07.393-04:00Realy? That's the best you can come up with -...Realy? That's the best you can come up with - a bunch of boneheads? Maybe you should take the time to look at the evidence in the case? Or maybe you should talk to the wives or parents of the two slain soldiers. Or maybe you should take the time to remember that a referral decision is but one of the first steps in a court-martial and doesn't preclude a later decision to remove the capital decision in exchange for a plea of guilty. Perhaps you can remind everyone of exactly what the incentive is for an accused to plead guilty at a non-capital referral where they are facing a mandatory minimum of life/with if convicted and a maximum of LWOP. Incentive? None. Might as well fight it out and see what happens. Seems to me, at this stage, a capital referral simply keeps all options on the table. I don't view that as a decision made by boneheads.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34853720.post-51891165847778330912009-07-13T11:34:02.710-04:002009-07-13T11:34:02.710-04:00Question:
This case involved a suspended sentence...Question:<br /><br />This case involved a suspended sentence -- basically, as I read it, the LtC was allowed to retire as a Major, and the rest of the sentence was suspended. I assume there was no proceeding in revision to revoke the suspended sentence.<br /><br />Maybe I should know the answer to this, but... does the suspension of the entire punishment, if the suspension period runs and thus the entire suspension is executed, divest the CCA and CAAF of further jurisdiction? I assume the answer is no, since the case was reviewed, but I'm not sure why.Cap'n Crunchnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34853720.post-6841054193824648202009-07-13T10:31:32.784-04:002009-07-13T10:31:32.784-04:00The issue is not whether or not the rule is consti...The issue is not whether or not the rule is constitutional. The issue is whether the rule does or does not create a jurisdictional deadline. The SG could, just as the two dissenting CAAF judges did, determine that the rule is not jurisdictional. It would require no rewriting of the UCMJ, just a particular interpretation.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34853720.post-73906755163749886962009-07-13T09:21:40.550-04:002009-07-13T09:21:40.550-04:00Then petition Congress to change the rules. The r...Then petition Congress to change the rules. The rule, in and of itself, does not appear to be unconstitutional. the President not defending it really would be akin to the President changing the UCMJ, not his job.<br /><br />What is this thing, a petition of which you speak? Jeez, never thought to look there but I appreciate your in depth analysis.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34853720.post-43300991770441462682009-07-13T08:34:22.319-04:002009-07-13T08:34:22.319-04:00I think I figured out one of the Judge Baker puzzl...I think I figured out one of the Judge Baker puzzles, but honestly the rest elludes me. "Unmarried" means not married to each other so as to take the conduct out of that zone of protection-e.g. Cohabitation.Mike "No Man" Navarrehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11434921480452541955noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34853720.post-42795902892694579262009-07-13T08:03:05.460-04:002009-07-13T08:03:05.460-04:00If you really want an answer to your question, try...If you really want an answer to your question, try reading the cert petition, I think that's the whole point.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34853720.post-10155401730147266482009-07-13T07:21:32.467-04:002009-07-13T07:21:32.467-04:00Let's just hope that some important military c...Let's just hope that some important military commission case doesn't arise in the summer. CAAF will be on vacation. Me thinks I'd rather be before an art iii court than CAAF. At least those courts work full time. Senators Graham and McCain can't do anything right.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34853720.post-30738991527796253682009-07-13T05:05:10.660-04:002009-07-13T05:05:10.660-04:00You mean like the transgendered law suit against t...You mean like the transgendered law suit against the Library of Congress? Seems like the administration is pretty open to make a decision. However, a decision to agree with petitioner is to disagree that Congress set a time limit for petitioning CAAF. Congress spoke, why would the President think the rule should be otherwise?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34853720.post-47004373379058353962009-07-12T22:56:40.997-04:002009-07-12T22:56:40.997-04:00I'm hearing the full Senate is going to take t...I'm hearing the full Senate is going to take this up for a vote tomorrow (Monday, 13 July) or on Tuesday.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34853720.post-44049613769301050482009-07-12T22:39:06.872-04:002009-07-12T22:39:06.872-04:00And they should seriously consider whether the adm...And they should seriously consider whether the administration agrees with Rodriguez, not just take the opposite of the petitioner's position like so many prosecutors inside (and, let's be fair, outside) of MJ.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34853720.post-84700118380037223102009-07-12T17:58:46.541-04:002009-07-12T17:58:46.541-04:00Huh?Huh?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34853720.post-11022937872782468662009-07-12T14:48:12.644-04:002009-07-12T14:48:12.644-04:00Far more!!!Far more!!!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com