tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34853720.post9169589182189531930..comments2023-08-24T10:39:23.460-04:00Comments on CAAFlog: Czachorowski amicusDwight Sullivanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11657981110237418710noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34853720.post-36775136870190559902008-03-11T14:40:00.000-04:002008-03-11T14:40:00.000-04:00Litka is supervising the law student who will be a...Litka is supervising the law student who will be arguing.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34853720.post-23399862943040070122008-03-04T21:42:00.000-05:002008-03-04T21:42:00.000-05:00Not sure what the amicus angle is. The two issues...Not sure what the amicus angle is. The two issues granted seem to overlap:<BR/><BR/>WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ABUSED HIS DISCRETION BY ADMITTING INTO EVIDENCE AAC'S HEARSAY STATEMENTS IN VIOLATION OF MIL.R.EVID. 807 AND THE SIXTH AMENDMENT OF THE CONSTITUTION.<BR/><BR/>WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ABUSED HIS DISCRETION BY ADMITTING INTO EVIDENCE AAC'S HEARSAY STATEMENTS IN VIOLATION OF THE NOTICE REQUIREMENT OF MIL.R.EVID. 807.<BR/><BR/>The CDC made several motions for an oral argument before NMCCA on these issues, which NMCCA never extended the courtesy of even addressing. NMCCA just ignored the requests for oral argument. NMCCA then released a short decision, blowing-off the raised issues. But at least they restrained themselves and didn't call them frivolous.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34853720.post-37271886424519847812008-03-04T20:38:00.000-05:002008-03-04T20:38:00.000-05:00Litka is a recently departed Army GAD attorney tha...Litka is a recently departed Army GAD attorney that has his own practice now, and a snazzy website (BZ to his website designer, free plug here: http://www.militaryappeal.com/home/aboutmrlitka.html). Sadly his blog is infrequently updated, last entry July 2007. Litka argued Santos, Craig, and McNutt for GAD.Mike "No Man" Navarrehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11434921480452541955noreply@blogger.com