tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34853720.post8449019217219171792..comments2023-08-24T10:39:23.460-04:00Comments on CAAFlog: CAAFlog Talk . . . with Linda RichmanDwight Sullivanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11657981110237418710noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34853720.post-82472058215541171342007-03-10T11:42:00.000-05:002007-03-10T11:42:00.000-05:00The answer to this one is right in my wheelhouse, ...The answer to this one is right in my wheelhouse, not only No, but hell No! I think the more important question is trial level representation where actual conflicts are not only possible, but common. What I cannot understand is why service legal assistance shops will send their conflict clients to another service, but not their conflict criminal defense clients. Someone give me the logic there? Until the heads of service defense commands embrace the idea, which there is no evidence I can see of that happening, the appellate issue is one tap away from the triple tap theory.Mike "No Man" Navarrehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11434921480452541955noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34853720.post-34202598754550605922007-03-10T07:55:00.000-05:002007-03-10T07:55:00.000-05:00This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com