tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34853720.post7896745670034006010..comments2023-08-24T10:39:23.460-04:00Comments on CAAFlog: New Air Force case: a predictable kvetch and a complimentDwight Sullivanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11657981110237418710noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34853720.post-7492934749661005142007-01-06T08:25:00.000-05:002007-01-06T08:25:00.000-05:00Another AFCCA ruling might warrant some attention:...Another AFCCA ruling might warrant some attention: the unpublished opinion in US v. Baskin, from 13 December. In Baskin, the Court cited CAAF's logic from the relatively recent US v. Cohen and US v. Brisbane opinions in ruling that the observer for a probable-cause urinalysis was required to give an Article 31 rights advisement before asking questions (the Appellant had dipped the collection cup into the toilet and filled it with water...). Consequently, it set aside the Appellant's conviction for a false official statement.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15863833024967062970noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34853720.post-62887611687945095092007-01-06T07:23:00.000-05:002007-01-06T07:23:00.000-05:00What is surprising is that cases like this continu...What is surprising is that cases like this continue to pour into the appellate defense divisions. One prime time news show has made a cottage industry out of posing as fourteen-year-old girls with hamsters, and then turning the would be pedophiles over to local police when they arrive at the house as the cameras roll. Were there ever fourteen-year-old girls on line who were eager to engage in sexual intercourse with forty-year-old men? If there ever were, only ten thousand federal and state law enforcement officers remain.Guert Gansevoorthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15166200402003364021noreply@blogger.com