tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34853720.post7450427467319873357..comments2023-08-24T10:39:23.460-04:00Comments on CAAFlog: Kennedy v. La. - No Joy for Louisiana in Military JusticevilleDwight Sullivanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11657981110237418710noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34853720.post-84622967046353441872008-10-01T15:11:00.000-04:002008-10-01T15:11:00.000-04:00Anon 1423 = Mrs. CAAFlogAnon 1423 = Mrs. CAAFlogMike "No Man" Navarrehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11434921480452541955noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34853720.post-75601158241959295222008-10-01T14:43:00.000-04:002008-10-01T14:43:00.000-04:00Wow!! Very interesting. I did not think the Supre...Wow!! Very interesting. I did not think the Supremes would leave the door open for the death penalty for rape in the military, but they did. I am guessing from reading this, however, that to even have a chance at passing constitutional muster, the rape (child or adult) must also have had some significant military impact, like a senior enlisted raping the child of one of his subordinates using his position and trust to effect the rape. <BR/><BR/>NOOOOO, I am not saying that is constitution or arguing whether it should be, all I am noting is that for there to even be a chance, I think there probably needs to also be included some severe military impact to go along with the impact rape already has on its victim. That, and not having Col Sullivan as the defense counsel.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com