tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34853720.post4591405713656223667..comments2023-08-24T10:39:23.460-04:00Comments on CAAFlog: New v. Gates: certworthy?Dwight Sullivanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11657981110237418710noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34853720.post-46315759333384147472007-04-17T20:48:00.000-04:002007-04-17T20:48:00.000-04:00My magic 8-ball says "all signs point to no."My magic 8-ball says "all signs point to no."John O'Connorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08014476389355562158noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34853720.post-73449884341135126102007-04-17T18:45:00.000-04:002007-04-17T18:45:00.000-04:00If the Supreme Court was the 10th Cir. or NMCCA, y...If the Supreme Court was the 10th Cir. or NMCCA, you could guarantee the SG's brief would garner a grant of review. Alas, it is not and I think the Supreme's regard military justice with the same general attitude as most of the rest of the legal community, "Military what?". Aside from a few Senators ill fated attempts to portray the system as the greatest system since Arabic law, Military justice is like Barry Bonds' alleged connection to Balco, an unknown known-as Mr. Rumsfeld would say.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com