tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34853720.post4058562724634188884..comments2023-08-24T10:39:23.460-04:00Comments on CAAFlog: Is it time time gets a nip and tuck at CAAF?Dwight Sullivanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11657981110237418710noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34853720.post-9979564548241694692007-12-27T19:52:00.000-05:002007-12-27T19:52:00.000-05:00Sorry, but this is another one of those comments t...Sorry, but this is another one of those comments that begins with, "When I was a captain . . . ."<BR/><BR/>When I was a captain at Navy-Marine Corps Appellate Defense during the Reagan and first Bush Administrations, one simply didn't seek enlargements from CAAF. (Well, it was then called CMA, but one didn't seek enlargements from them either.) My view of enlargement practice at CAAF is that it's ulimately more work for the counsel, since the counsel has to prepare and file the substantive submission AND an enlargement request instead of simply the substantive submission. Anything that deters counsel from seeking enlargements from CAAF is a good thing in my book.Dwight Sullivanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11657981110237418710noreply@blogger.com